I cancelled my social media accounts and have told my friends I won't be joining their Telegram or Signal accounts - so either we meet in person or exchange only the briefest of information via email or text, otherwise I'll be mired in negative emotions all the time. Don't get me wrong, I still spend too much time checking out alternative media online but my attitude to the vaccinated sheeple is that they are uneducated and not my equals. I'll throw facts at them and if they stick, it's a win for them. Keep laughing, stay sane, John.
Yes, I’m fairly aware there are quite a few big names about working as reverse propagandists. Controlled opposition etc.. When it comes to Steve Kirsch however… (regardless of certain critiques posted about him).. I’m more than pleased he’s not going half way in revealing the damage being done by the jabs. He’s going pretty hard on that and really sticking his neck out.
I remember at one point, I had a department chair, who was not the smartest cookie in the jar. My colleague and I were engaged in a professional conversation, when this guy entered to room, so we politely informed him about our topic in a few sentences. He kept nodding with a silly smile on his face that suggested he had no idea what we were talking about (it was Linguistics) and after 10-15 seconds, he left the room. My colleague and I looked at each other, and one of us asked,
"How much do you think he understood out of this?"
Sir, you are well beyond the levels of most PhDs. :) The trick is to catch you in good mood!
Other than that, I concur in your definition of morons. A moron is who believes he knows, because he is qualified/certified to know. :) Ignorant people are less likely to be "morons."
The above quote was only for fun; a common aphorism, but it's a lot more likely to apply to people who think they are "experts" in their own domains.
That's funny. I do have two doctoral degrees, but I have always been several years ahead of the flock, I couldn't find sources (somebody had to be and I was the victim), so I was impossible to indoctrinate, because my profs had literally no idea what I was talking about. It took a good while to find credible opponents. While my field is AI and natural languages, I am anything but an "expert." The field is too complex for anyone to fully see through it and it is also an open system that can change any minute, and it does. So, nobody "granted" me anything; my committee members were simply humble enough to admit that I knew infinitely more about my materials than they did. It was a miracle that they allowed me to pass, because nearly everything I did was refuting the foundations on which they were operating...
I know enough about the "academic" crap that I don't need more input. The short story is that I never sold myself out, so here I am, in rural KY, living on next to nothing, but still ready to die as a human being (not a "Freemason").
that I don't exactly accept "authority," even if it proves itself to be respectable. At that point, I am willing to take it for a discussion as an equal.
When I was nine, my father wanted to be home-schooled, but my mother wanted me "to have my childhood." The poor creature didn't realize I was bullied all the time, because I was 4-5 years ahead. I was also deadly bored of school, because I read more than what they would "teach" me the next ten or 100 years. :)
I was naive when I went for graduate degrees, but I won my national award only because I had an honest and knowledgable committe chair at the contest and Linguistics happened to be a blind spot for people with connections. (I did win a few other awards and scholarships "by accident" before that, too.)
Of course, once I was in the system, it spat me out, no matter where I went.
Yes, absolutely. Reiner Fuellmich’s Corona Investigative Committee have proven 100% beyond any doubt, that the testing method for the virus that has never been isolated and very likely doesn’t even exist, is more than good enough for me! The whole thing is no doubt totally and utterly bogus. And the PCR’s inventor Dr Kary Mullis’ mysterious death on the very eve of this worldwide charade is more than suspicious. There’s no way he’d have tolerated his invention being used in this way. Personally… I try not to get bogged down in the back and forths of whether or not the virus, or viruses exist, and the validity of the testing methods etc etc., I leave that for others. My greatest wish is that these people are brought to account for the horrific crimes they’ve committed against humanity. I want to see these mongrels like Gates and Fauci prosecuted and held to account. My biggest fear is that in the end.. all attempts at prosecuting these monsters may all get bogged down in a huge scientific debate… rather than a crimes against humanity trial.
You seem to have overlooked my point.. “I leave that for others”. It’s not that I’m NOT CONCERNED about such things… it’s more a case of it not being my domain of expertise. There are people such as yourself who are better suited to tackling these matters. It’s a matter of prioritising and knowing what your strengths are.
I wouldn’t say Fuellmich’s team “hasn't been able to do shit in like 32 months”…. Fuellmich never said that he was going to head future prosecutions. His team’s ‘main priority’ was to be an ‘evidence collection agency’ of sorts. A hub from which other law firms worldwide could obtain usable information in trials. I think they’ve done a grand job.
I cancelled my social media accounts and have told my friends I won't be joining their Telegram or Signal accounts - so either we meet in person or exchange only the briefest of information via email or text, otherwise I'll be mired in negative emotions all the time. Don't get me wrong, I still spend too much time checking out alternative media online but my attitude to the vaccinated sheeple is that they are uneducated and not my equals. I'll throw facts at them and if they stick, it's a win for them. Keep laughing, stay sane, John.
Haha.. great comment! All the best to you too mate! Stay sane.. if ya can!
Yes, I’m fairly aware there are quite a few big names about working as reverse propagandists. Controlled opposition etc.. When it comes to Steve Kirsch however… (regardless of certain critiques posted about him).. I’m more than pleased he’s not going half way in revealing the damage being done by the jabs. He’s going pretty hard on that and really sticking his neck out.
It happens, lol. We are all human.
At least, some of us, maybe... :)
Believe we know who to leave out of this.
I remember at one point, I had a department chair, who was not the smartest cookie in the jar. My colleague and I were engaged in a professional conversation, when this guy entered to room, so we politely informed him about our topic in a few sentences. He kept nodding with a silly smile on his face that suggested he had no idea what we were talking about (it was Linguistics) and after 10-15 seconds, he left the room. My colleague and I looked at each other, and one of us asked,
"How much do you think he understood out of this?"
"Whatever he could?"
"How much was he able to?"
"As much as he understood."
We left it at that. :)
Haha! Right!
Anyway, we like to think we are human. Some of us fall short of even that, lol.
Here is another funny cartoon, this one is for anger management:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/on-anger
"You can't argue with morons; you would have to lower yourself to their levels, where they are more experienced!"
Too true Ray! The way I see it... I turned that anger into creativity. I squeezed another little story out of it!
Yes, I also need some inspiration to write, and the incessant pushing Orban forward as the paragon of Freedom royally ticked me off! :)
I guess, the cartoon in my link was quite applicable! :)
Sir, you are well beyond the levels of most PhDs. :) The trick is to catch you in good mood!
Other than that, I concur in your definition of morons. A moron is who believes he knows, because he is qualified/certified to know. :) Ignorant people are less likely to be "morons."
The above quote was only for fun; a common aphorism, but it's a lot more likely to apply to people who think they are "experts" in their own domains.
That's funny. I do have two doctoral degrees, but I have always been several years ahead of the flock, I couldn't find sources (somebody had to be and I was the victim), so I was impossible to indoctrinate, because my profs had literally no idea what I was talking about. It took a good while to find credible opponents. While my field is AI and natural languages, I am anything but an "expert." The field is too complex for anyone to fully see through it and it is also an open system that can change any minute, and it does. So, nobody "granted" me anything; my committee members were simply humble enough to admit that I knew infinitely more about my materials than they did. It was a miracle that they allowed me to pass, because nearly everything I did was refuting the foundations on which they were operating...
I know enough about the "academic" crap that I don't need more input. The short story is that I never sold myself out, so here I am, in rural KY, living on next to nothing, but still ready to die as a human being (not a "Freemason").
And, I hope you noticed from my last article
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freaks-of-science
that I don't exactly accept "authority," even if it proves itself to be respectable. At that point, I am willing to take it for a discussion as an equal.
When I was nine, my father wanted to be home-schooled, but my mother wanted me "to have my childhood." The poor creature didn't realize I was bullied all the time, because I was 4-5 years ahead. I was also deadly bored of school, because I read more than what they would "teach" me the next ten or 100 years. :)
I was naive when I went for graduate degrees, but I won my national award only because I had an honest and knowledgable committe chair at the contest and Linguistics happened to be a blind spot for people with connections. (I did win a few other awards and scholarships "by accident" before that, too.)
Of course, once I was in the system, it spat me out, no matter where I went.
We are all "things beyond things"!
Can I cut and paste your tirade above so I can memorize it?
Sure you can. If you share it anywhere... please just paste the url to the orig article. Cheers.
We've all been there. Stay sane
Yes, absolutely. Reiner Fuellmich’s Corona Investigative Committee have proven 100% beyond any doubt, that the testing method for the virus that has never been isolated and very likely doesn’t even exist, is more than good enough for me! The whole thing is no doubt totally and utterly bogus. And the PCR’s inventor Dr Kary Mullis’ mysterious death on the very eve of this worldwide charade is more than suspicious. There’s no way he’d have tolerated his invention being used in this way. Personally… I try not to get bogged down in the back and forths of whether or not the virus, or viruses exist, and the validity of the testing methods etc etc., I leave that for others. My greatest wish is that these people are brought to account for the horrific crimes they’ve committed against humanity. I want to see these mongrels like Gates and Fauci prosecuted and held to account. My biggest fear is that in the end.. all attempts at prosecuting these monsters may all get bogged down in a huge scientific debate… rather than a crimes against humanity trial.
You seem to have overlooked my point.. “I leave that for others”. It’s not that I’m NOT CONCERNED about such things… it’s more a case of it not being my domain of expertise. There are people such as yourself who are better suited to tackling these matters. It’s a matter of prioritising and knowing what your strengths are.
I wouldn’t say Fuellmich’s team “hasn't been able to do shit in like 32 months”…. Fuellmich never said that he was going to head future prosecutions. His team’s ‘main priority’ was to be an ‘evidence collection agency’ of sorts. A hub from which other law firms worldwide could obtain usable information in trials. I think they’ve done a grand job.
“subversive”.. How so?